Apples and Copper Pot, Oil on Canvas, 16 by 20 in. |
Apples and Brass Artillery Shell Coffee Pot, Oil on Canvas, 16 by 20 in. |
Apples, Pears, Grapes and Brass Coffee Pot, Oil on Canvas, 16 by 20 in. |
It’s probably a good thing to eat apples regularly, but I
never got into the habit. A 94-year-old
painter I know eats one just about every day for lunch, after he finishes his
organic peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
With his trusty Swiss Army knife, he elegantly carves the apple into
slices, offering one or more to any lunch companions. Al still teaches two one-day-a-week painting
classes, belongs to a couple of art clubs where he continues to exhibit his
paintings, and draws and paints in open sessions offered to members of The Art
Students League, where he studied 75 years ago.
No doubt it’s the apples that keep him going.
My usual lunch, ever since I started painting more than 30
years ago, consists of a slice of pizza and a carbonated, caffeinated beverage, often followed
by a fat-laden, sugary snack and a cup of coffee. Maybe that’s why I’m always exhausted, my
stomach is upset and I have a sour disposition.
By the way, it’s impossible these days to get a good slice of pizza in
my fashionable neighborhood on Manhattan’s
Upper West Side.
All the good pizza parlors have been replaced by ritzy sushi bars,
trattorias and patisseries.
Like Cezanne, I’ve painted a lot of pictures of apples. Cezanne might have enjoyed eating apples as
well as painting them. But I doubt if he
would have written a stupid blog post about it one way or the other. But we have heard that he once boasted, “With
an apple I will astonish Paris.” About all I’ve ever done with apples is use
them as props for my still life paintings, with absolutely no thought of
astonishing anyone other than myself. I
usually throw the apples in the garbage after I have harvested a crop of
paintings featuring them. I’ve tried to
be less profligate. A few years ago I bought
a juicer and used it for a little while to blend apples and carrots into very tasty
smoothies. But gulping down the thick drinks
quickly to “retain all the vitamins” and then hurrying to clean the dozens of
juicer parts was so bothersome that the device now sits gathering dust on a top
shelf in my kitchen.
I just tended to another crop of apple paintings inspired by
a four-pound bag of “seconds” of varying
shapes, sizes, colors and conditions I bought for $2 at the local farmer’s
market a couple of weeks ago. As usual,
I very much enjoyed working on each of the five paintings illustrated here that
I pulled out of the bag. And as usual, I
regret being unable to see the obvious drawing flaws while the paint is still
wet. Going back to correct them when the
paint is dry is not at all enjoyable, but sometimes necessary to soothe my troubled soul,
even though I end up losing the freshness of the initial paint handling and
remain a troubled soul forever, at least with respect to the paintings.
I ran out of fresh stretched canvases in the size I wanted (16
by 20 inches), so a couple of the paintings are over old ones I scraped down a
little to get rid of the heaviest ridges of dried paint. I wish I had properly sanded and re-primed the
surfaces with a quick-drying oil primer, but I was in a hurry to finish my
latest apple cycle and didn’t want to switch gears from painting to priming. Those apple paintings will probably
self-destruct in less than 200 years. At
the very least, I expect a little pentimento revealing the head sketches I
painted over. Quel dommage!
John Singer Sargent, William M. Chase, N. A., 1902, Oil on canvas, 62 1/2 by 41 3/8 in, Metropolitan Museum of Art |
My favorite story about this particular oil painter’s curse
appears in James Montgomery Flagg’s autobiography, “Roses and Buckshot.” The story concerns the nearly full-length portrait of William
Merritt Chase hanging in the Metropolitan Museum that Sargent dashed off in his
London studio in 1902. The amusingly acerbic
Flagg considered Chase a stuffed shirt and a “silly little painter of fish” who
couldn’t draw. He wrote that Chase’s
students collected $10,000 to pay Sargent to paint the portrait. Sargent apparently didn’t have a fresh canvas
either, so he turned an unfinished Wertheimer portrait upside down to paint the
Chase portrait. “Years passed, and in
the crotch of Chase’s breeches gradually emerged a head of Wertheimer upside
down,” Flagg wrote. “This sort of thing
can happen when you paint over a used canvas.
An expert has since touched it out, and happily for the world of art,
Mr. Wertheimer no longer gazes upside down between William Chase’s legs.” I believe the Met’s conservators are on the
case and monitor it closely. The paint
surface does look pretty distressed in that area of the painting.
Accompanying the apples in two of my paintings is a brass coffee pot fashioned out of a World War One artillery shell. I picked it up years ago at the famous
weekend outdoor flea market that used to operate at Sixth
Avenue and 26th Street. Celebrities went there early in the morning
to get the prime stuff before us late-risers made the scene. The guy who sold the coffee pot to me said it
came from the dining room of an ocean liner.
The initials UAL are inscribed on the coffee pot. That’s one of those many historical details you
come across that are interesting but seemingly impossible to research online. There is a venerable Dutch shipping company
that operates the Universal Africa Lines (UAL).
That seems a likely provenance for the coffee pot, but there’s no readily
accessible indication that the cargo shipping outfit was around way back when and
serving coffee to the crew from an old artillery shell. If you think your coffee pot is heavy, try
pouring a cup out of this brass monster, something I’ve never tried myself. The servers on board the ship must have been
recruited for their muscularity.
This painting of the apples in a wicker basket was my first
in this series and a real disappointment.
I loved the arrangement, which could be considered sort of a vague
reference to that famous still life painting of fruit by Caravaggio. But it was rainy and cloudy on the two days I
had set aside for painting it.
Consequently, the values and colors are muddied and unsuccessful. What can you do? I’ve tried adding artificial light on such
days, but the mix of daylight and artificial light seemed so unnatural that I
abandoned the practice. And I won’t
paint solely by artificial light, against the advice of such eminent authorities
as the London-based painter Bernard Dunstan (1920 -). Dunstan wrote a couple of excellent books on
painting techniques, including a little one on still life painting in which he
states he is indifferent to the type of light he paints under. “One cannot always be waiting and putting off
work because of the light; very little would get done at all at certain times
of the year,” Dunstan wrote. ‘If one
intends to get a regular amount of work done, it is essential to come to terms
with this problem. Artificial light is
at least steady and unchanging, and it can have a beauty of its own.”
I emphatically don’t share Dunstan's enthusiasm for
artificial light, but I agree that you can’t put off the work waiting for great
daylight. Although experience has taught
me I’m being foolish, I stubbornly paint on with the idea that if you get the
light effect right the painting will look good, no matter how dull the daylight
is. Painters of the past have proven
that it can be done, so it’s not impossible, just improbable. The subject matter has a great deal to do
with the success or failure of such efforts, and objects whose great charm is
their local color, like apples, are probably not the best choice for painting
on a dull day.
Meanwhile, my mercifully unwaxed farmer’s market apples aren’t quite finished yet, so I might get another painting or two out of them before they get tossed in the garbage -- the apples, that is. The fate of the paintings is yet to be determined.
Meanwhile, my mercifully unwaxed farmer’s market apples aren’t quite finished yet, so I might get another painting or two out of them before they get tossed in the garbage -- the apples, that is. The fate of the paintings is yet to be determined.
Apples in Bowl, Oil on Canvas, 15 by 18 in. |